Step 1. Steal content from everyone
Step 2. Train your shity AI based on stolen data
Step 3. Tell the world how you are revolutionizing everything
Step 4. Start selling stolen data as Gen AI with Ads
Step 5. Ultimately, you will be another ad company, but this time, you are stealing the work of journalists, book authors, artists, music, video, and small content creators to make money by claiming Gen AI-created content
OpenAI explores advertising in its AI products www.theverge.com/20...
In an interview with the Financial Times, OpenAI’s new CFO Sarah Friar said that the startup was considering an ads model and it planned to be “thoughtful about when and where we implement” ads. In a statement following the interview, though, Friar added:
@nixCraft I'd love to see some legal wordsmithing conditioning lawful access to a digital service on non-participation of any entity developing generative AI or acting as an agent thereof, non-disclosure of any text or other media to any such entity, and non-use of generative AI in any interaction with the service. To take it beyond breach of contract and other civil cases, perhaps it could be tied to perjury. And to facilitate prosecution, perhaps it could require consent to disclosure proving violation and waiver of, for example, indemnification contracts.
And then provide a button on the registration (and if necessary, login) form to fill that legalese into a textarea (e.g., "under penalty of perjury, I, …."), submission of which is required for any access to the service.
Fanciful thinking perhaps, but it would be nice to have a slice of the Internet free of human outputs being absorbed into LLMs and the like and free of LLM etc. slop spamming the inputs.
